From 110 posts in 2006 to 4 posts in 2009, that's just crazy. I have only my unmotivated self to blame...but the thing about doing work like this is that you can't rely on motivation to get you to do it. You gotta just do it. Will I just do it?
I certainly will try...once I get some sleep. Laters!
Friday, May 29, 2009
Friday, March 27, 2009
From pro-choice to pro-life
I used to be pro-choice/anti-abortion, where I did not agree with abortion personally but I agreed with the right of a woman to choose whether or not to have an abortion. I would have encouraged a woman to not have one, I would have done everything I could to convince a woman to not abort a fetus, but at the end I would say it’s her choice and I would not try to change the law that allowed her to do so.
Recent discussions and arguments have led me to switch my position from pro-choice to pro-life, where I believe that abortions of convenience or on-demand should be made illegal, and abortions should only be allowed for cases of rape or the mother’s health. I have not become a militant pro-lifer, nor would I be too upset if abortions were severely limited to pre-first trimester or earlier, even up to one month or so. However, I have reached the mind-set where I can’t call myself a pro-choice person anymore. Before I say what changed my mind, I just want to give my thoughts on the majority of pro-life persons and arguments that I see out there.
Abortion is a topic that is like gasoline on a fire. It is almost impossible to have a rational discussion on the matter without assumptions being made on both sides, and propaganda coming from both sides. Some pro-lifers seem to be intolerant, propaganda-spouting, non-thinking fundamentalists, unwilling to engage the opposition or acknowledge the points that they may have. For them, all pro-choicers are baby-killers and that’s all there is to it. Such close-mindedness doesn’t do anything for me, and those arguments played no part in my shift to a pro-life position. Some pro-choicers view the fetus as some form of parasite, and think that abortion is just another method of birth control, and until the baby is born, it’s an it. I never held that view, and I think that such a view is just as intolerant and unrealistic. I’ll grant that it’s hard to discuss something this touchy in a rational method, but if you as a pro-lifer are going to convince someone like me who was pro-choice, you have to come at it with a willingness to dialogue and answer questions from a non-partisan viewpoint. I was not proud to be pro-choice, but based on my view of free will, I felt that I had to respect the views of those who may not agree that life begins at birth, etc.
That brings me to my next point; Arguments on whether life begins at birth or not did not play a major role in changing my view. As a Christian, I am pre-disposed to believe that life does begin at birth…but I can’t force my view on someone else, especially when there is sufficient evidence that can be interpreted as saying life begins when the fetus is able to survive on its own or not, etc. Arguments along this line will eventually boil down to whether one is using a religious worldview or not, and while this can work from a moral perspective (abortion is wrong), I don’t think it can work from a legal worldview. “Abortion is wrong, therefore it should be illegal.” “Why is abortion wrong?” “The Bible says so.” “But I don’t believe in the Bible.” “Doesn’t matter, I’m still making it illegal.” There are valid arguments against this position that I could entertain, but the main point I want to make here is that this argument leads to much moralizing and less clarity from a legal standpoint, at least to me.
The argument that changed my mind was when I realized the existence of the Unborn Victims of Violence act. I post it below:
he operative portion of the law, now codified as Title 18, Section 1841 of the United States Code, reads as follows:
Sec. 1841. Protection of unborn children
(a) (1) Whoever engages in conduct that violates any of the provisions of law listed in subsection (b) and thereby causes the death of, or bodily injury (as defined in section 1365) to, a child, who is in utero at the time the conduct takes place, is guilty of a separate offense under this section.
(2) (A) Except as otherwise provided in this paragraph, the punishment for that separate offense is the same as the punishment provided under Federal law for that conduct had that injury or death occurred to the unborn child’s mother.
(B) An offense under this section does not require proof that—
(i) the person engaging in the conduct had knowledge or should have had knowledge that the victim of the underlying offense was pregnant; or
(ii) the defendant intended to cause the death of, or bodily injury to, the unborn child.
(C) If the person engaging in the conduct thereby intentionally kills or attempts to kill the unborn child, that person shall instead of being punished under subparagraph (A), be punished as provided under sections 1111, 1112, and 1113 of this title for intentionally killing or attempting to kill a human being.
(D) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the death penalty shall not be imposed for an offense under this section.
(b) The provisions referred to in subsection (a) are the following:
(1) Sections 36, 37, 43, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 229, 242, 245, 247, 248, 351, 831, 844 (d), (f), (h)(1), and (i), 924 (j), 930, 1111, 1112, 1113, 1114, 1116, 1118, 1119, 1120, 1121, 1153 (a), 1201 (a), 1203, 1365 (a), 1501, 1503, 1505, 1512, 1513, 1751, 1864, 1951, 1952 (a)(1)(B), (a)(2)(B), and (a)(3)(B), 1958, 1959, 1992, 2113, 2114, 2116, 2118, 2119, 2191, 2231, 2241 (a), 2245, 2261, 2261A, 2280, 2281, 2332, 2332a, 2332b, 2340A, and 2441 of this title.
(2) Section 408(e) of the Controlled Substances Act of 1970 (21 U.S.C. 848 (e)). (3) Section 202 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2283).
(c) Nothing in this section shall be construed to permit the prosecution—
(1) of any person for conduct relating to an abortion for which the consent of the pregnant woman, or a person authorized by law to act on her behalf, has been obtained or for which such consent is implied by law;
(2) of any person for any medical treatment of the pregnant woman or her unborn child; or
(3) of any woman with respect to her unborn child.
(d) As used in this section, the term “unborn child” means a child in utero, and the term “child in utero” or “child, who is in utero” means a member of the species homo sapiens, at any stage of development, who is carried in the womb.
When I became aware of this act, and read it, I realized that the law itself had defined life as being at birth, from the bolded section in clause (d). Having established that, I immediately saw a disconnect between clause ( c) and (d). Why is it a crime for someone else to harm an unborn child at any stage of development, yet it is ok for the mother to do so? I cannot answer that question, so I conclude that if it’s a crime for the one, it should be a crime for the other.
That is what caused me to become pro-life. I am interested in hearing other’s positions trying to explain this conundrum, but I think that this is the best argument the pro-life side has to repeal/alter existing abortion laws.
Recent discussions and arguments have led me to switch my position from pro-choice to pro-life, where I believe that abortions of convenience or on-demand should be made illegal, and abortions should only be allowed for cases of rape or the mother’s health. I have not become a militant pro-lifer, nor would I be too upset if abortions were severely limited to pre-first trimester or earlier, even up to one month or so. However, I have reached the mind-set where I can’t call myself a pro-choice person anymore. Before I say what changed my mind, I just want to give my thoughts on the majority of pro-life persons and arguments that I see out there.
Abortion is a topic that is like gasoline on a fire. It is almost impossible to have a rational discussion on the matter without assumptions being made on both sides, and propaganda coming from both sides. Some pro-lifers seem to be intolerant, propaganda-spouting, non-thinking fundamentalists, unwilling to engage the opposition or acknowledge the points that they may have. For them, all pro-choicers are baby-killers and that’s all there is to it. Such close-mindedness doesn’t do anything for me, and those arguments played no part in my shift to a pro-life position. Some pro-choicers view the fetus as some form of parasite, and think that abortion is just another method of birth control, and until the baby is born, it’s an it. I never held that view, and I think that such a view is just as intolerant and unrealistic. I’ll grant that it’s hard to discuss something this touchy in a rational method, but if you as a pro-lifer are going to convince someone like me who was pro-choice, you have to come at it with a willingness to dialogue and answer questions from a non-partisan viewpoint. I was not proud to be pro-choice, but based on my view of free will, I felt that I had to respect the views of those who may not agree that life begins at birth, etc.
That brings me to my next point; Arguments on whether life begins at birth or not did not play a major role in changing my view. As a Christian, I am pre-disposed to believe that life does begin at birth…but I can’t force my view on someone else, especially when there is sufficient evidence that can be interpreted as saying life begins when the fetus is able to survive on its own or not, etc. Arguments along this line will eventually boil down to whether one is using a religious worldview or not, and while this can work from a moral perspective (abortion is wrong), I don’t think it can work from a legal worldview. “Abortion is wrong, therefore it should be illegal.” “Why is abortion wrong?” “The Bible says so.” “But I don’t believe in the Bible.” “Doesn’t matter, I’m still making it illegal.” There are valid arguments against this position that I could entertain, but the main point I want to make here is that this argument leads to much moralizing and less clarity from a legal standpoint, at least to me.
The argument that changed my mind was when I realized the existence of the Unborn Victims of Violence act. I post it below:
he operative portion of the law, now codified as Title 18, Section 1841 of the United States Code, reads as follows:
Sec. 1841. Protection of unborn children
(a) (1) Whoever engages in conduct that violates any of the provisions of law listed in subsection (b) and thereby causes the death of, or bodily injury (as defined in section 1365) to, a child, who is in utero at the time the conduct takes place, is guilty of a separate offense under this section.
(2) (A) Except as otherwise provided in this paragraph, the punishment for that separate offense is the same as the punishment provided under Federal law for that conduct had that injury or death occurred to the unborn child’s mother.
(B) An offense under this section does not require proof that—
(i) the person engaging in the conduct had knowledge or should have had knowledge that the victim of the underlying offense was pregnant; or
(ii) the defendant intended to cause the death of, or bodily injury to, the unborn child.
(C) If the person engaging in the conduct thereby intentionally kills or attempts to kill the unborn child, that person shall instead of being punished under subparagraph (A), be punished as provided under sections 1111, 1112, and 1113 of this title for intentionally killing or attempting to kill a human being.
(D) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the death penalty shall not be imposed for an offense under this section.
(b) The provisions referred to in subsection (a) are the following:
(1) Sections 36, 37, 43, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 229, 242, 245, 247, 248, 351, 831, 844 (d), (f), (h)(1), and (i), 924 (j), 930, 1111, 1112, 1113, 1114, 1116, 1118, 1119, 1120, 1121, 1153 (a), 1201 (a), 1203, 1365 (a), 1501, 1503, 1505, 1512, 1513, 1751, 1864, 1951, 1952 (a)(1)(B), (a)(2)(B), and (a)(3)(B), 1958, 1959, 1992, 2113, 2114, 2116, 2118, 2119, 2191, 2231, 2241 (a), 2245, 2261, 2261A, 2280, 2281, 2332, 2332a, 2332b, 2340A, and 2441 of this title.
(2) Section 408(e) of the Controlled Substances Act of 1970 (21 U.S.C. 848 (e)). (3) Section 202 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2283).
(c) Nothing in this section shall be construed to permit the prosecution—
(1) of any person for conduct relating to an abortion for which the consent of the pregnant woman, or a person authorized by law to act on her behalf, has been obtained or for which such consent is implied by law;
(2) of any person for any medical treatment of the pregnant woman or her unborn child; or
(3) of any woman with respect to her unborn child.
(d) As used in this section, the term “unborn child” means a child in utero, and the term “child in utero” or “child, who is in utero” means a member of the species homo sapiens, at any stage of development, who is carried in the womb.
When I became aware of this act, and read it, I realized that the law itself had defined life as being at birth, from the bolded section in clause (d). Having established that, I immediately saw a disconnect between clause ( c) and (d). Why is it a crime for someone else to harm an unborn child at any stage of development, yet it is ok for the mother to do so? I cannot answer that question, so I conclude that if it’s a crime for the one, it should be a crime for the other.
That is what caused me to become pro-life. I am interested in hearing other’s positions trying to explain this conundrum, but I think that this is the best argument the pro-life side has to repeal/alter existing abortion laws.
Tuesday, March 17, 2009
What am I going to watch now??
It seems the days of good TV are numbered...
"The Wire" is over. "Battlestar Galactica" ends this coming Friday. "Lost" has a season and a half to go, but the writing is on the wall. "The Shield": powerful finale, gone for the ages. "Pushing Daisies": Gone before its time. "Chuck" is still around, but for how long? Old faves like "Dexter" and "24" are still on my radar, but I've only downloaded them, yet have not watched them yet. Is there no good TV left?
There is still hope, I guess. I've heard good things about "Mad Men", "Breaking Bad", "Sons of Anarchy" and some other ones that have popped up. I downloaded 'em, but haven't started to watch yet...time not being on my side. I got into "In Treatment" and can't wait for the second season, just as soon as I finish the first season.
I am going to miss those shows when they're gone though...here's to the new ones up-and-coming. Don't write for the masses, write for your own vision, eh?
"The Wire" is over. "Battlestar Galactica" ends this coming Friday. "Lost" has a season and a half to go, but the writing is on the wall. "The Shield": powerful finale, gone for the ages. "Pushing Daisies": Gone before its time. "Chuck" is still around, but for how long? Old faves like "Dexter" and "24" are still on my radar, but I've only downloaded them, yet have not watched them yet. Is there no good TV left?
There is still hope, I guess. I've heard good things about "Mad Men", "Breaking Bad", "Sons of Anarchy" and some other ones that have popped up. I downloaded 'em, but haven't started to watch yet...time not being on my side. I got into "In Treatment" and can't wait for the second season, just as soon as I finish the first season.
I am going to miss those shows when they're gone though...here's to the new ones up-and-coming. Don't write for the masses, write for your own vision, eh?
Friday, January 30, 2009
A great column from today's Observer
I really appreciate and agree with the points made in this column.
Social mobility and social exclusion
We block the ghetto exit and we pay the price!
Franklin Johnston
Friday, January 30, 2009
The channels to social mobility are at a trickle and our promising youth now turn to mischief. In past decades, we turned back the programmes which enabled the poor to move up in large numbers. This crop of leaders in medicine, politics, management, law, etc, is the last large group to come through the upwardly mobile pipeline.
Franklin Johnston
This group is old school and can be shamed; those after have no shame. So too, old money is urbane and understated; new money (legal and illegal) is loud, ill-mannered, in-your-face, sets a bad example and has no sense of service. Most of today's leaders are the first in their family to attend university; the first to attend high school, to complete primary school or to read and write. Many mastered the knife and fork late in life and found out that a dry white wine is wet. But they are the product of a healthy, orderly social process. We learn, advance and replenish all classes.
Today, the upwardly mobile channels are blocked as that great host of escapees from the ghetto (now aged 45 to 60 plus), by their policies and rhetoric, broke the ladders they climbed and slashed the social fabric. Trainable people are few and have no jobs; new workers are not replenishing the middle class and the top people - our repository of experience and financial security, not intimidated by politicians, is depleted. This group upholds our principles, defends the rule of law, are benefactors of the poor and the gatekeepers of our democracy. This group is passing, silenced, migrated or marginalised. Politicians want to supplant this group by using our taxes to curry favour with poor people for them to depend on politics instead. Most poor people make no progress, but they are ambitious, and sadly are leaching into the dark side in order to "make it".
Many no longer aspire to work; as one said when asked to cut a lawn, " I not lookin' slavery, I want cash." Workers are not revivifying the middle class which is also stagnant and the top class is no longer our vigorous arbiter and defence against corrosive people and policies. Our social contract is in breach.
The most feared people today are gunmen and corrupt politicians. Take your life or take your livelihood; both wreak havoc on the society. Citizens are destroyed or neutered; starved of work, lose their savings and driven to exile. We are afraid to speak so as not to upset powerful people. Some, poor and rich alike, see no evil, hear no evil. They don't want to be involved as they have families, jobs, contracts, permits and licences which depend on politics. they are involved already as our democracy is threatened. Victimisation (real or imagined) is rife. People don't buck the going orthodoxy, we are losing our freedom and don't care because we make money or hope to do so. We "bite our tongues", say nothing, but we have consciences, and at home we vent and bitch. Our family and our nation suffer. Our silence makes us ill. Stress kills. Our friends (men) die prematurely in their 60s and 70s. We are a nation on the edge! Some years ago we won a public contract. Soon after, there was a change of government and the new PM took away the job and gave it to "his consultant". That consultant, a professional colleague who did not have the expertise, gave us a sub-contract to do the work, with one change; the reports were to be printed on their letterhead. and some wonder why we don't work much at home; mind free, man free!
Independent opinion is not valued. The upper class used to keep the rapacious in check by ostracising them as the law couldn't touch them. Today, raptors savage the mores of our land. They don't care for principle or decorum; they were never habilitated and cannot be rehabilitated. The rich support the status quo; most made their money honestly, against all odds and deserve every penny. My mentor, the incomparable, late Abe Issa would say "business must always be in power". support all parties, give extra to the one you like. The rich are immune from victimisation and need to get active in protecting our values; the clergy, university teachers and those who by vocation and tenure cannot be victimised, should speak up for the speechless. Their silence is deafening.
Entry-level jobs are so scarce, they are bequeathed to worker's children by collusion with employers. Poor people without contacts cannot get a job. Sadly, in the past three decades few workers made it into the middle class. The nouveau riche went from poor to rich in one jump (even the taxman can't fathom it). They live in the right areas, but as they did not progress via the social conduit and don't have the values. They are visible, loud, gaudy, have more money than sense, no work ethic or community spirit. They can donate more; their chariots are bigger; their children are walking brands with the latest gadgets; but they don't write, are not missed at civic meetings and do not drive a social change agenda. They are tolerated; what they think is respect, is fear.
The social circulation system is broken and social exclusion is growing. As legitimate expectations flounder, drugs, the antisocial and the criminal take their place. I spoke to some students at Jose Marti and found that their "get out of jail free" card was to cut a tune like Beenie Man and get rich; school was an obstacle, not an opportunity. To get our social mobility pipeline flowing again we must fix the broken education; the decline of ethics, values, aspiration and desire. Fix the postcode lottery which stigmatises the poor. If your postcode is not Kingston 6 or 8, "dog nyam yu suppa" for good schools and jobs. Next, government's failure to plan and regulate housing. We started in Jones Town; money and family grew so we moved above Torrington Bridge, then above Cross Roads and finally into peri-urbia. Our planners have no progressive housing model; there is no "starter home" - the one bedroom for the person or young couple - new workers. If you start across the causeway, when money or family grows, instead of selling up to a young couple and buying a bigger house, you keep adding blocks and steel until this modern, prized seaside town becomes a slum. Last, we are taught to work, not to make a job; new jobs are few, yet we reward existing jobs - teachers, nurses and security forces etc and ignore new entrants. We must reopen the conduits of social mobility, otherwise the seething magma in the bowels of our nation will erupt and destroy the dollyhouse. More anon!
Social mobility and social exclusion
We block the ghetto exit and we pay the price!
Franklin Johnston
Friday, January 30, 2009
The channels to social mobility are at a trickle and our promising youth now turn to mischief. In past decades, we turned back the programmes which enabled the poor to move up in large numbers. This crop of leaders in medicine, politics, management, law, etc, is the last large group to come through the upwardly mobile pipeline.
Franklin Johnston
This group is old school and can be shamed; those after have no shame. So too, old money is urbane and understated; new money (legal and illegal) is loud, ill-mannered, in-your-face, sets a bad example and has no sense of service. Most of today's leaders are the first in their family to attend university; the first to attend high school, to complete primary school or to read and write. Many mastered the knife and fork late in life and found out that a dry white wine is wet. But they are the product of a healthy, orderly social process. We learn, advance and replenish all classes.
Today, the upwardly mobile channels are blocked as that great host of escapees from the ghetto (now aged 45 to 60 plus), by their policies and rhetoric, broke the ladders they climbed and slashed the social fabric. Trainable people are few and have no jobs; new workers are not replenishing the middle class and the top people - our repository of experience and financial security, not intimidated by politicians, is depleted. This group upholds our principles, defends the rule of law, are benefactors of the poor and the gatekeepers of our democracy. This group is passing, silenced, migrated or marginalised. Politicians want to supplant this group by using our taxes to curry favour with poor people for them to depend on politics instead. Most poor people make no progress, but they are ambitious, and sadly are leaching into the dark side in order to "make it".
Many no longer aspire to work; as one said when asked to cut a lawn, " I not lookin' slavery, I want cash." Workers are not revivifying the middle class which is also stagnant and the top class is no longer our vigorous arbiter and defence against corrosive people and policies. Our social contract is in breach.
The most feared people today are gunmen and corrupt politicians. Take your life or take your livelihood; both wreak havoc on the society. Citizens are destroyed or neutered; starved of work, lose their savings and driven to exile. We are afraid to speak so as not to upset powerful people. Some, poor and rich alike, see no evil, hear no evil. They don't want to be involved as they have families, jobs, contracts, permits and licences which depend on politics. they are involved already as our democracy is threatened. Victimisation (real or imagined) is rife. People don't buck the going orthodoxy, we are losing our freedom and don't care because we make money or hope to do so. We "bite our tongues", say nothing, but we have consciences, and at home we vent and bitch. Our family and our nation suffer. Our silence makes us ill. Stress kills. Our friends (men) die prematurely in their 60s and 70s. We are a nation on the edge! Some years ago we won a public contract. Soon after, there was a change of government and the new PM took away the job and gave it to "his consultant". That consultant, a professional colleague who did not have the expertise, gave us a sub-contract to do the work, with one change; the reports were to be printed on their letterhead. and some wonder why we don't work much at home; mind free, man free!
Independent opinion is not valued. The upper class used to keep the rapacious in check by ostracising them as the law couldn't touch them. Today, raptors savage the mores of our land. They don't care for principle or decorum; they were never habilitated and cannot be rehabilitated. The rich support the status quo; most made their money honestly, against all odds and deserve every penny. My mentor, the incomparable, late Abe Issa would say "business must always be in power". support all parties, give extra to the one you like. The rich are immune from victimisation and need to get active in protecting our values; the clergy, university teachers and those who by vocation and tenure cannot be victimised, should speak up for the speechless. Their silence is deafening.
Entry-level jobs are so scarce, they are bequeathed to worker's children by collusion with employers. Poor people without contacts cannot get a job. Sadly, in the past three decades few workers made it into the middle class. The nouveau riche went from poor to rich in one jump (even the taxman can't fathom it). They live in the right areas, but as they did not progress via the social conduit and don't have the values. They are visible, loud, gaudy, have more money than sense, no work ethic or community spirit. They can donate more; their chariots are bigger; their children are walking brands with the latest gadgets; but they don't write, are not missed at civic meetings and do not drive a social change agenda. They are tolerated; what they think is respect, is fear.
The social circulation system is broken and social exclusion is growing. As legitimate expectations flounder, drugs, the antisocial and the criminal take their place. I spoke to some students at Jose Marti and found that their "get out of jail free" card was to cut a tune like Beenie Man and get rich; school was an obstacle, not an opportunity. To get our social mobility pipeline flowing again we must fix the broken education; the decline of ethics, values, aspiration and desire. Fix the postcode lottery which stigmatises the poor. If your postcode is not Kingston 6 or 8, "dog nyam yu suppa" for good schools and jobs. Next, government's failure to plan and regulate housing. We started in Jones Town; money and family grew so we moved above Torrington Bridge, then above Cross Roads and finally into peri-urbia. Our planners have no progressive housing model; there is no "starter home" - the one bedroom for the person or young couple - new workers. If you start across the causeway, when money or family grows, instead of selling up to a young couple and buying a bigger house, you keep adding blocks and steel until this modern, prized seaside town becomes a slum. Last, we are taught to work, not to make a job; new jobs are few, yet we reward existing jobs - teachers, nurses and security forces etc and ignore new entrants. We must reopen the conduits of social mobility, otherwise the seething magma in the bowels of our nation will erupt and destroy the dollyhouse. More anon!
Friday, January 02, 2009
Happy New Year to all!
I won't make any promises about blogging more, but I have become interested more in writing. What I need now is motivation and muses...
I randomly wrote this dialogue just to see what would happen, this is where I stopped. Would you be interested in learning more of the story?
“What do you think?”
“I think he’s wrong. I don’t believe that Martin would actually kill someone, y’know?”
“You never know…some people can and will surprise you. Martin always seemed kind of weird to me.”
“Weird? How?”
“Remember the time in 5th form when we found that baby’s skeleton in that abandoned house behind school?”
“how can I forget. What about it?”
“When we were walking away, I saw Martin hanging around a bit longer, gazing at the skeleton with a strange look…almost as if he were longing to touch it, or wondering what it felt like to leave the baby there…”
“Naw, that’s crazy man. You’re just reading your own feelings into the situation. I know you never liked Martin from he first came to our class, how would you know what he was wondering?”
“Yeah, well maybe I was right to not like him. You didn’t see that look on his face, and I hoped I’d never see it again.”
I randomly wrote this dialogue just to see what would happen, this is where I stopped. Would you be interested in learning more of the story?
“What do you think?”
“I think he’s wrong. I don’t believe that Martin would actually kill someone, y’know?”
“You never know…some people can and will surprise you. Martin always seemed kind of weird to me.”
“Weird? How?”
“Remember the time in 5th form when we found that baby’s skeleton in that abandoned house behind school?”
“how can I forget. What about it?”
“When we were walking away, I saw Martin hanging around a bit longer, gazing at the skeleton with a strange look…almost as if he were longing to touch it, or wondering what it felt like to leave the baby there…”
“Naw, that’s crazy man. You’re just reading your own feelings into the situation. I know you never liked Martin from he first came to our class, how would you know what he was wondering?”
“Yeah, well maybe I was right to not like him. You didn’t see that look on his face, and I hoped I’d never see it again.”
Friday, October 10, 2008
Yes, i've been offline a while...no excuses. A lot has been happening in my life, but right now I'm pretty cool. This post is to put up a very small sample of pictures of my recent trip to Japan, which was 7 kinds of awesome :)
Monday, May 26, 2008
I'm still alive...
and I still have thoughts to give. I'll give 'em soon...
it's been a busy year thus far, I'll tell you that.
it's been a busy year thus far, I'll tell you that.
Wednesday, March 26, 2008
gas prices a kill
I got these in a forwarded email, and...well, I laugh so that I won't cry :D
....
�
�
< /FONT>
....
< /FONT>
Tuesday, March 11, 2008
Competent Communicator Geoff Marshall, whoo hoo!!
Finally!
After long last, I've accomplished my CC Award from Toastmasters International. 10 speeches from the Basic Manual, and I can finally call myself CC Geoff Marshall. No more ordinary "TM" for me, hehehe. I will kinda miss it though...Thanks be to God for His inspiration when I did that speech. Too bad the devil had to do his thing later that night by making my car break down...cho!
Anyways, onwards to the new manuals! I'm going to do "The Entertaining Speaker" and "The Professional Speaker" for the first manuals, and tackle my CL manual as well for the next year.
My number 10 speech is presented below.
--------------------------------------------------------------
Before God and All mankind.
I pledge the love and loyalty of my heart
The wisdom and courage of my mind,
The strength and vigour of my body
in the service of my fellow citizens.
After long last, I've accomplished my CC Award from Toastmasters International. 10 speeches from the Basic Manual, and I can finally call myself CC Geoff Marshall. No more ordinary "TM" for me, hehehe. I will kinda miss it though...Thanks be to God for His inspiration when I did that speech. Too bad the devil had to do his thing later that night by making my car break down...cho!
Anyways, onwards to the new manuals! I'm going to do "The Entertaining Speaker" and "The Professional Speaker" for the first manuals, and tackle my CL manual as well for the next year.
My number 10 speech is presented below.
--------------------------------------------------------------
Before God and All mankind.
I pledge the love and loyalty of my heart
The wisdom and courage of my mind,
The strength and vigour of my body
in the service of my fellow citizens.
I promise to stand up for justice,
Brotherhood and Peace, to work diligently and creatively,
To think generously and honestly, so that,
Jamaica may, under God, increase in beauty, fellowship
and prosperity, and play her part in advancing the welfare
of the whole human race.
Before comrade or showa, there was Jamaica. Before Trafigura or Tivoli, there were the Blue Mountains and Dunns River. Before the scourge of drugs and guns, there was still Lover's Leap and Fern Gully.. Before the English, before the Spanish, even before the Tainos, this green and fertile island existed, lying in wait for those who would be blessed to inhabit it.
Blessed? Yes, blessed. When last did you feel blessed to live in Jamaica?
Living in Jamaica is not for the faint of heart, and we must be realistic about the challenges that face us. Crime, corruption and social disorder are the main themes of the day. We as Jamaicans have begun to EXPECT corruption from our officials, and we have become quite numb to the situation; we may talk much about it when exposed, but not do much about it. A corrupt society cannot progress. Social order is more like social DISORDER. Standards are down, slackness is up. Children are fighting teachers, leaving school illiterate, it seems common decency has become uncommon. We are fed a steady diet of negative commentary and it seems that if we have not yet hit rock bottom, we are almost there. What can we do?
I know what we can do. We need to take our attentions from ourselves, and focus on a greater good.
I pledge my heart forever
To serve with humble pride
This shining homeland, ever
So long as earth abide.
I pledge my heart, this island
As God and faith shall live
My work, my strength, my love and
My loyalty to give.
O green isle of the Indies,
Jamaica, strong and free,
Our vows and loyal promises
O heartland, 'tis to Thee.
I spent 8 years in the USA, from August 1998 to February 2006. I used to think that I'd work about 4 or 5 years there and then I'd consider coming back home with some money and work experience. Maybe I was saying that to salve my conscience, maybe I knew deep down that I wouldn't really return to stay if I had any say in the matter. Did I really want to be a part of the 2.5 million-strong Jamaican diaspora? Why would I want to go back home where all these problems abounded, where money was in short supply?
I left grad school in May 2005 and moved from New Mexico to California to begin a new job and start the process of getting my "green card". The job was a job, I wasn't PASSIONATE about it but it was something I could do and it paid decently. I decided to just watch the ride and see how life would turn out after I got some work experience and funds from this American job. Six weeks after I started working, I was fired from the job, and that's when the ride really started. Losing that job led me to an 8-month sojourn across the USA and an in-depth experience of living on the edge in the land of plenty. The sojourn culminated in my return to Jamaica in February 2006, and as I prepared to come back to Jamaica I felt humiliated, afraid and ashamed. I felt that I had been unable to "cut it" in the USA and that I would be returning to a life less than what I had expected for myself in the USA.
Coming back home to Jamaica was the best thing that ever happened to me. I came back home and just slotted into everything as if I had never left. I came back home to a job where I felt I could make a difference and where my skills were utilized. I came back home to my family and a society where I could be myself, as opposed to projecting fake sincerity and fake productivity. If I had not returned home, I would probably be stressed out in a job I was enduring for the money, I would probably be in more debt, and I would definitely have suffered in my spiritual life. Coming back home showed me that to be in Jamaica CAN be a blessing, and that there is hope for our country.
Crime, social disorder, politics, all these things taken into account, it is still a blessing to live in Jamaica. The audacity of hope still exists in this nation, as seen in our national pledge and national songs. The hope and vision that was so abundant at our nation's birth has not died, it has just been covered with despair and self-focus! We have taken our eyes from our country's upliftment and focused it on our own upliftment at the expense of Jamaica and our fellow man. "The difference between a helping hand and an outstretched palm is a twist of the wrist."
We are blessed to be a part of the nation that produced Sam Sharpe, Marcus Garvey, Norman Manley, Alexander Bustamante, Bob Marley, Louise Bennett and many other great human beings. Who here has not felt pride at the accomplishments of Merlene Ottey, Asafa Powell and Dion Hemmings? Who here still vividly remembers the Reggae Boyz as they played in France, and how they captured the hearts of the entire world?
We are blessed to live in a nation where our drinking water is not (yet) contaminated with chemicals, pharmaceuticals and other contaminants. People come from all over the world to enjoy our beaches and rivers, and we have ready access to them all the time!
We are blessed to have a rich heritage that inspires us. Even though our ancestors suffered many hardships, they perservered and instilled in our nation the fierce pride of being Jamaican. We are blessed to not be as wracked with racial conflict as other nations are.
We are blessed to be able to go to Dunns River Falls whenever we choose, to hike the Blue Mountains, to visit Lovers Leap, to see the sun set at Negril Point. My job takes me around the island, and every time I go out, I am filled with hope and reminded that I live in a beautiful country.
It is easy to criticize, and we must criticize when we see injustice and inequality. Yet, talk is cheap, and if we just complain without doing our part, what benefit is that? If we do not make the change, who will? If we do not care, who will? If we do not extend a helping hand and work for the betterment of our nation, who will do so? When we are able to put aside politics and getting ahead at others expenses, then our nation will rise to the greatness we are capable of. When we realize that WE are the government and those in power serve at OUR command, then we will elect our leaders based on their performance and not based on their handouts. When we realize that our children are our future and that all of us need to be involved in their education and upbringing, then we will see more productivity from them and less pornography. When we become less like crabs in a barrel and more like bees in a hive, then Jamaica will be vibrant and strong once again! We must realize that even though our nation will sink as far as we let it sink, the flip side is that it will rise as far as we are willing to take it. As Phillip Sherlock so aptly wrote:
Jamaica land of beauty, We promise faithfully
To serve thee with our talents and bring our gifts to thee
Jamaica we will always in honour of thy name
Work steadfastly and wisely and never bring thee shame
From riverside to mountain from cane-field to the sea
Our hearts salute Jamaica Triumphant, proud and free.
Wednesday, February 27, 2008
Life is good, even if you sometimes feel it ain't...
It's been a while since I posted, and I've been doing and experiencing a lot of things. I have a lot to do this month at work and church, as well as for next month...
Anyone been watching "The Wire"? Hurry up and catch it before it finishes forever, it's only the best TV show ever made. RIP Omar...
more lata, i suppose.
Anyone been watching "The Wire"? Hurry up and catch it before it finishes forever, it's only the best TV show ever made. RIP Omar...
more lata, i suppose.
Friday, December 14, 2007
South Africa Pics!
Finally, Pics of South Africa. The car was actually at Heathrow Airport :D wish I could have won it...
Photos (finally) Sweden
Finally putting up pics from Sweden, St. Kitts and South Africa. This first set is from Sweden, and includes pictures of the Vasa, me and Kaie, Old Town Stockholm, and the Nobel Palace/Museum.
Wednesday, December 12, 2007
Update
I've moved, and I'm liking it...
Things are ok otherwise.
I went to South Africa, and will be posting up pics as soon as I get a chance to.
that's pretty much it for now...
----------------
Now playing: William Ackerman - Processional
via FoxyTunes
Things are ok otherwise.
I went to South Africa, and will be posting up pics as soon as I get a chance to.
that's pretty much it for now...
----------------
Now playing: William Ackerman - Processional
via FoxyTunes
Thursday, October 18, 2007
Legalizing drugs!
We often have the knee-jerk reaction to the illegality of drugs in: “Of course drugs should be illegal! They cause so much damage and ill health, they aren’t good for the body, the bad effects of illegal drugs are well known and the government is protecting people from these effects.”
So why doesn’t the government outlaw tobacco and alcohol? Why doesn’t the government regulate the abundance of fast food and junk food which also cause illness and death? Alcohol and tobacco are the number 1 and 2 related causes of death in the USA, and the dangers of a bad diet are well known to everyone of us here. In contrast, 0.9 % of the working-age population uses cocaine, while 10% of the working-age population uses ganja in Jamaica. If the usage is so low, why is the drug-related crime so high?
Illegal drugs are illegal because many years ago, those in power in the higher classes decided that any substance that could be used by the lower status to achieve a narcotic effect must be outlawed and controlled “for their own good.” In doing so however, they created a black market effect which is obvious today, and which has led to the equality:
DRUGS = MONEY = POWER
At one recent seminar of Swiss bankers, it was estimated that the global take from illicit activities had reached over $1 trillion annually, the vast majority of which comes from drug dealing. In Mexico, the country's gross domestic product was $280 billion last year, while estimates of drug money flowing through the country range from $70 billion to $200 billion annually. Presidents there are now turning to the drug cartels to ensure financing of their traditional, and unofficial, multimillion-dollar retirement accounts. In Jamaica, corruption has become a more visible issue. What would you guess is the most likely source of these corruption funds?
With so much money available in drugs, how can someone resist the lure? For the love of money, people will swallow drugs and risk years in prison or death from ruptured bags. For the love of money, people will strap on drugs to their body and risk humiliation and years in prison. For the love of money, young black men will take up illegal guns and defend their turf to sell their product. For the love of money, young black men will kill each other and anyone who gets in their way of making that money. For the love of money, those in power will ignore this reality and keep this truth under wraps: the illegal nature of these drugs is what makes the crime related to these drugs so prevalent.
Ignored in all this love of money is the love of the product that causes so much suffering among the disenfranchised and poor in society. If there were no demand for illegal drugs, there would be no drug traffic. I ask you however; how can you cut the demand for drugs?
You can’t. If you want to go out tonight and get drunk, or get high, or hook up with a prostitute, or do whatever vice you wanted, there isn’t a soul in this room who can stop you or remove that desire from you. Even if we were to beg and plead with you to try and persuade you to not do it, the final decision would be yours and not ours. If we were by some miracle able to remove all coke or prostitutes or whatever your vice may be, odds are that you would just find another vice to fill whatever hole or need you that you think that vice can fill. It is society’s duty to help our fellow man to find purpose and meaning in life, and we will not do that by making these substances illegal. By doing so, we simply reduce him to a common criminal, when he is really a soul crying out for help. We need to guide him a greater purpose instead of attempting to remove the purpose that he currently has.
I am not preaching the virtues of ganja, or the medicinal properties of cocaine. I’m not promoting the obvious truth that people can put whatever they want with their bodies, nor am I saying that the government should not have control over these substances. I say that with more legal control over these currently illegal drugs, much of the power that goes with that money will revert from the hands of criminals into the hands of the authorities. We can either leave the money from drugs in the hands of unscrupulous criminals who then corrupt the government, or we can put that money directly into the hands of the government by legalizing the drugs. Which is the lesser evil?
So why doesn’t the government outlaw tobacco and alcohol? Why doesn’t the government regulate the abundance of fast food and junk food which also cause illness and death? Alcohol and tobacco are the number 1 and 2 related causes of death in the USA, and the dangers of a bad diet are well known to everyone of us here. In contrast, 0.9 % of the working-age population uses cocaine, while 10% of the working-age population uses ganja in Jamaica. If the usage is so low, why is the drug-related crime so high?
Illegal drugs are illegal because many years ago, those in power in the higher classes decided that any substance that could be used by the lower status to achieve a narcotic effect must be outlawed and controlled “for their own good.” In doing so however, they created a black market effect which is obvious today, and which has led to the equality:
DRUGS = MONEY = POWER
At one recent seminar of Swiss bankers, it was estimated that the global take from illicit activities had reached over $1 trillion annually, the vast majority of which comes from drug dealing. In Mexico, the country's gross domestic product was $280 billion last year, while estimates of drug money flowing through the country range from $70 billion to $200 billion annually. Presidents there are now turning to the drug cartels to ensure financing of their traditional, and unofficial, multimillion-dollar retirement accounts. In Jamaica, corruption has become a more visible issue. What would you guess is the most likely source of these corruption funds?
With so much money available in drugs, how can someone resist the lure? For the love of money, people will swallow drugs and risk years in prison or death from ruptured bags. For the love of money, people will strap on drugs to their body and risk humiliation and years in prison. For the love of money, young black men will take up illegal guns and defend their turf to sell their product. For the love of money, young black men will kill each other and anyone who gets in their way of making that money. For the love of money, those in power will ignore this reality and keep this truth under wraps: the illegal nature of these drugs is what makes the crime related to these drugs so prevalent.
Ignored in all this love of money is the love of the product that causes so much suffering among the disenfranchised and poor in society. If there were no demand for illegal drugs, there would be no drug traffic. I ask you however; how can you cut the demand for drugs?
You can’t. If you want to go out tonight and get drunk, or get high, or hook up with a prostitute, or do whatever vice you wanted, there isn’t a soul in this room who can stop you or remove that desire from you. Even if we were to beg and plead with you to try and persuade you to not do it, the final decision would be yours and not ours. If we were by some miracle able to remove all coke or prostitutes or whatever your vice may be, odds are that you would just find another vice to fill whatever hole or need you that you think that vice can fill. It is society’s duty to help our fellow man to find purpose and meaning in life, and we will not do that by making these substances illegal. By doing so, we simply reduce him to a common criminal, when he is really a soul crying out for help. We need to guide him a greater purpose instead of attempting to remove the purpose that he currently has.
I am not preaching the virtues of ganja, or the medicinal properties of cocaine. I’m not promoting the obvious truth that people can put whatever they want with their bodies, nor am I saying that the government should not have control over these substances. I say that with more legal control over these currently illegal drugs, much of the power that goes with that money will revert from the hands of criminals into the hands of the authorities. We can either leave the money from drugs in the hands of unscrupulous criminals who then corrupt the government, or we can put that money directly into the hands of the government by legalizing the drugs. Which is the lesser evil?
Tuesday, July 17, 2007
Election time!
At long last, the elections have been called for August 27. A whiles away, but the date is set, and i'm ready to cast my vote.
The ads have been on the radio for a while now. I have to admit that the JLP ads are way much better than the PNP ads. I hope that keeps up :D
The ads have been on the radio for a while now. I have to admit that the JLP ads are way much better than the PNP ads. I hope that keeps up :D
Thursday, July 05, 2007
No, I am not dead. Though at times, I feel I'd get more rest that way...
a whole lot goes on, but can't talk much about it now. Hope everyone is doing well!
a whole lot goes on, but can't talk much about it now. Hope everyone is doing well!
Sunday, April 15, 2007
West Indies Cricket players!!
Y'all suck. You suck so bad. You suck like a Hoover vacuum cleaner. I actively root against y'all now. I hope Bangladesh creams your party asses next match.
Tuesday, March 27, 2007
Wednesday, March 21, 2007
Day...all days beginning to run together!
I think the entire group is beginning to get burnout from the intense pace of the program. The plus side is that things will be slowing down a bit today, we have only morning lectures and the rest of the day is for project work. Tommorrow seems to be a bit easier as well.
Stockholm is a nice enough city, a bit smaller than I expected but very modern. And Cold. There is a lot more to do here, but as time and funds aren't on my side, I haven't done much besides walk around Old Town with my friend Kaie, and do a bit of shopping.
Oh yeah, i got to meet Kaie and her boyfriend Robert. After talking to her online for a good while, it was really nice to meet a fellow SDA who could help me with church and everything. She is a great person, and I'm glad we are friends, hahahaha.
More photos of Stockholm, including Old Town, me and Kaie, pics of Stockholm City Hall, etc. etc.
Stockholm is a nice enough city, a bit smaller than I expected but very modern. And Cold. There is a lot more to do here, but as time and funds aren't on my side, I haven't done much besides walk around Old Town with my friend Kaie, and do a bit of shopping.
Oh yeah, i got to meet Kaie and her boyfriend Robert. After talking to her online for a good while, it was really nice to meet a fellow SDA who could help me with church and everything. She is a great person, and I'm glad we are friends, hahahaha.
More photos of Stockholm, including Old Town, me and Kaie, pics of Stockholm City Hall, etc. etc.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
